Feb 28 2005
Oscars
Throughout the year, there are only two times I will plug in the TV to watch something. One is for the Super Bowl and the other is for the Oscars. Despite what Chris Rock said, it is one of the few things on TV somewhat worth watching. Most TV is crap, IMHO. I suppose some of the other award shows, might be kind of interesting, but sicne I don’t watch TV, the Emmys are kind of worthless. Likewise for the multitude of music award shows because most of the acts I’ve never heard of or care to listen to.
Anyway, as far as Oscar shows go, this one was kind of…boring. Chris Rock’s opening was pretty bland. It had a few moments, but none of them are memorable. I don’t know if it is because he toned down his usual act, or because this was the first time he hosted, and was trying to find the right fit. Probably the best thing he did was the sequence where he interviewed people at a theatre, asking their opinions of the Best Picture nominees. The answers were pretty funny. Aside from that, the only funny one-liner I can remember was his quip about next year’s ceremony being held in the parking lot – drive-thru to get your trophy and a McFlurry, then leave.
Not that it being boring was all Rock’s fault. The idea of presenting some of the awards from the seats, was pretty stupid, as was the idea of gathering all of the nominees of a category up on stage, then announcing the winner. Sure, it takes time for the people to get up on stage, but that is part of the drama. The music soaring while they are walking up to the stage, the hugs, the handshakes, and the kisses. They just won the Oscar. This is the once-in-a-lifetime chance. The pinnacle of their career. Let them enjoy it for the few extra seconds it takes to get to the stage.
The best speech of the evening was probably Jamie Foxx’s, especially when he mentioned that his daughter told him the eve if he didn’t win, he was still good.
Martin Scorcese is now 0 for 5 for Best Director, which ties him with Alfred Hitchcock. I was under the impression that the Oscars weren’t necessarily always given for the picture that was nominated, but sometimes was given to acknowledge a body of work. That said, I think Scorcese probably should have won the Oscar. On the upside for “Marty,” he was thanked more often than Harvey Weinstein, which I guess is something important in Hollywood (how often a person is thanked by name at the Oscars).
Overall, I thought it was fairly boring. Do I regret plugging in my TV and watching it? No. I might have to go check out some of the nominated films and see what they are all about. However, i was a bit disappointed by the telecast, and felt it could have been better.
Comments Off